QEIv18™ Equity Risk Intelligence
Same sealed engine family · SHA-256 verifiable provenance

Making buy-and-hold investable.

The index return is real; the way it is usually earned is not. Holding ES, NQ or YM outright means 100% risk exposure, 100% of the time — drawdowns of 35–38% in this record alone — a mandate no risk committee accepts. QEIv18 measures the order of each index's own movement every day through two independent physical lenses, steps aside when that order is lost, and re-engages when it returns — keeping index-class participation with a defined, recorded exit mechanism attached. Neither lens predicts. Both measure.

A sealed structural risk-state layer for professional equity-index exposure — allocators, pensions, treasuries and family offices.

The structural state
Invested● order intact
Stand-aside▼ order lost
Flags▼▲ exit · re-engage
LensesCoherence · Microstructure
IndexesES · NQ · YM
RecordSHA-256 · T+7 sealed
Physics only
No technical analysis. No fundamentals. No forecasts. No machine learning. No discretion.

A sealed, deterministic physics engine — QEIv18™ — measures the structural state of each index from price data alone. The engine cannot be quietly retuned: it is certified, hashed, and constant. Same inputs, same state, every time — for every client, on the same day.

Why this is not another model
In a market flooded with AI that predicts, QEIv18 doesn’t predict at all. It measures.
No training, no drift

Deterministic, not AI

No model is trained, no parameters are learned, nothing adapts to its own results. One frozen procedure produces the same state from the same data, every time — auditable and reproducible by you.

Measurement, not forecast

The present, not a probability

It does not estimate where price might go. It reads whether the structure holding your exposure has broken — a measurement of the system’s state right now, not a guess about the future.

Verifiable on day one

Trust the method, not a track record

You don’t have to take our history on faith. The thresholds are fixed, never fit to commodity data, and the entire sixteen-year computation is fingerprinted to a SHA-256 provenance chain you can re-verify independently.

16 years · 193 months · 2010–2026

Index-class returns. A fraction of the drawdown.

Total return and maximum drawdown under buy-and-hold versus each lens, June 2010 – June 2026, frictionless close-to-close — each desk models execution against its own fills. Buy-and-hold is shown as reference, not as a strategy: it means 100% risk exposure, 100% of the time. Both lenses are backtested on real market data from historical data under the identical sealed grammar; their live sealed records began 27 July 2026.

2 → 1 Two physics that share no calculation, applied uniformly to all three indexes with nothing tuned per market. Both cut the worst losses of holding the index while keeping index-class participation — by different routes, standing aside on different days. A fitted curve does not survive a change of physics. A real structure does. See the evidence →
Equity indexes · CME front month
ESS&P 500
B&H +612.8% / dd 35% · reference only
CoherenceMicro
Total return+345.1%+210.0%
Max drawdown20%35%
NQNasdaq-100
B&H +1566.9% / dd 35% · reference only
CoherenceMicro
Total return+530.6%+420.9%
Max drawdown32%32%
YMDow Jones
B&H +434.4% / dd 38% · reference only
CoherenceMicro
Total return+260.5%+373.2%
Max drawdown18%19%

On the Dow, the microstructure lens held 86% of buy-and-hold's return at half its drawdown. Where a lens shows the same drawdown as the index (ES tape, 35%), that too is shown — the record is judged whole.

The two lenses

Two ways a market loses its order — and what each costs.

Lens 1 · Coherence

The market's internal agreement

Coherence reads whether an index's movements are internally consistent — one narrative, everyone on the same side — or healthily conflicted. Lockstep looks orderly and is fragile: melt-ups and panics both cohere. The lens steps aside when agreement is unusually high and rising, and returns when two-sided trade resumes.

Strengths: the lowest drawdowns tested (ES 20%, YM 18%); the protection profile — fully in cash 27–38% of all months.
Costs: lags the index hardest in relentless melt-ups; hardest year −14.1% (2022); only 47% of months print positive, because so many print 0.0 — protected.

Lens 2 · Microstructure

The roughness of the tape itself

Finest-scale entropy reads the jaggedness of day-to-day movement. A smooth tape means deep liquidity and orderly flow; abrupt roughening is the microstructure stress that accompanies damage. The lens steps aside on unusual roughening and returns when the tape smooths.

Strengths: the smoothest client experience tested — 62% positive months, worst single month −7.9%; on the Dow, 86% of buy-and-hold's return at half its drawdown.
Costs: trails coherence on the S&P; the fastest signal cadence of the family — more state changes to follow.

Which lens leads long-term is a question we have deliberately left to forward data: both run sealed chains, side by side, and the record — not another backtest argument — will settle it.

Where the protection shows up

Months in three states — winning, protected, losing.

Across 193 months (equal-weight, three indexes): Coherence — 47% winning · 27% fully protected in cash · 25% losing; among exposed months 65% won; best streak 13 months, worst 4. Microstructure — 62% winning · 3% protected · 35% losing; among exposed months 64% won; best streak 10, worst 4; worst single month −7.9%. Every red cell is shown on the evidence page.

What you get

Index participation a mandate can actually hold.

Allocation discipline

A recorded exit mechanism

When an index's own movement loses order, a timestamped, sealed case to stand aside; when order returns, the case to re-engage — acted on under your own policy.

Committee-grade evidence

Defensible after the fact

Every state sealed before the session it applies to. The answer to "why were we in cash?" is a tamper-evident record, not a recollection.

Two independent reads

Disagreement is information

When both lenses defend, conviction; when they split — as they can for months — you see exactly how two physics read the same tape differently. Both records are sealed.

Performance before 27 July 2026 is a backtest on real historical market data; from 27 July 2026 every state of both lenses is recorded and cryptographically sealed before the trading session it applies to.

The open record

Watch it work, free.

A one-week delayed, sealed feed of both lenses on all three indexes — watch the states resolve against events on a tamper-evident record before any paid engagement.